Synergistic cellulase-surfactant interactions for degradation of bacterial cellulose

ABSTRACT

The disclosure is directed to cleaning compositions, methods of making the cleaning compositions, and methods of using the cleaning compositions. The cleaning compositions comprise an enzyme composition and a nonionic surfactant having an HLB between 10 and 22. Preferably, the enzyme compositions included in the cleaning compositions comprise a cellulase, an AA9 polypeptide having cellulolytic enhancing activity, a hemicellulase, an esterase, an expansin, a laccase, a ligninolytic enzyme, a pectinase, a peroxidase, a protease, a swollenin, or a combination or mixture thereof. The compositions are useful for degradation of bacterial cellulose.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 to provisionalapplication Ser. No. 62/684,984, filed Jun. 14, 2018, hereinincorporated by reference in its entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present disclosure relates to compositions comprising enzymecomposition and a nonionic surfactant having an HLB between 10 and 22,and methods of making and using the same. In particular, thecompositions are useful for degradation of bacterial cellulose.

BACKGROUND

Bacterial cellulose and other cellulose-based deposits can be difficultto remove. It is a common problem in drains associated with food andbeverage services, particularly in beverage tower drains where varioussweeteners and other beverage components drain. Bacterial cellulose canform polymeric clogs, often referred to as sugar snakes. A survey in2014 found that nearly one third of beverage tower operators hadbeverage tower drains with frequent clogs. This necessitates additionalmaintenance. Additionally, such clogs often result in malodor andattract insects such as flies. Bacterial cellulose can also be acomponent in slimes and biofilms. These can be difficult to remove asthey often contain carbohydrates, proteins, and bacteria within apolymeric matrix having many layers. Those layers can be difficult topenetrate for full cleaning effect. Treatments for bacterial celluloseand slimes may often require additional manual cleaning steps for fulleffectiveness, further the enzymes employed to breakdown the sugarsnakes, and in particular, the cellulose, often lose efficacy.

Accordingly, it is an objective of the present disclosure to developcompositions for cleaning bacterial cellulose deposits.

A further object of the present disclosure is to describe compositionsthat can retard the growth of bacterial cellulose deposits.

Still another object of the present disclosure is to provide to describecompositions having less than about 0.5 wt. % active proteinconcentration while maintaining cleaning efficacy.

Yet another object of the present disclosure is to describe compositionsuseful for treating, and methods of treating, bacterial cellulose thatdo not require personal protective equipment (PPE).

Other objects, advantages and features of the compositions and methodsof making and using the same will become apparent from the followingspecification taken in conjunction with the accompanying figures.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The present disclosure describes compositions for and methods ofremoving bacterial cellulose deposits, as well as methods of preparingthe compositions. It is an advantage of the compositions that they donot require PPE. Still a further advantage of the compositions is thatthey have a synergistic reaction between the enzyme composition andsurfactants that provides surprising efficacy against bacterialcellulose deposits.

In a preferred embodiment a composition for cleaning bacterial cellulosedeposits comprises from about 0.01 wt. % to about 2 wt. % of an enzymecomposition, from about 0.001 wt. % to about 7 wt. % of a nonionicsurfactant, from about 55 wt. % to about 97 wt. % of water. Preferably,the composition has a pH of less than about 5. Preferably the enzymecomposition comprises a cellulase, an AA9 polypeptide havingcellulolytic enhancing activity, a hemicellulase, an esterase, anexpansin, a laccase, a ligninolytic enzyme, a pectinase, a peroxidase, aprotease, a swollenin, or a combination or mixture thereof.

Preferably, the nonionic surfactant has an HLB value between 10 and 22.

In a preferred embodiment a multi-part system for cleaning bacterialcellulose deposits, the cleaning composition comprises from about 0.01wt. % to about 2 wt. % of an enzyme composition, from about 0.001 wt. %to about 7 wt. % of a nonionic surfactant, from about 55 wt. % to about97 wt. % of water. Preferably, the composition has a pH between about 2and about 11. Preferably the enzyme composition comprises a cellulase,an AA9 polypeptide having cellulolytic enhancing activity, ahemicellulase, an esterase, an expansin, a laccase, a ligninolyticenzyme, a pectinase, a peroxidase, a protease, a swollenin, or acombination or mixture thereof. Preferably, the nonionic surfactant hasan HLB value between 10 and 22.

In a preferred embodiment a composition for cleaning bacterial cellulosedeposits comprises from about 0.01 wt. % to about 2 wt. % of an enzyme,from about 0.001 wt. % to about 7 wt. % of a nonionic surfactant, fromabout 0.1 wt. % to about 5 wt. % of a buffering agent, and from about 55wt. % to about 97 wt. % of water. Preferably, the composition has a pHof between about 3 and about 5. Preferably the enzyme compositioncomprises a cellulase, an AA9 polypeptide having cellulolytic enhancingactivity, a hemicellulase, an esterase, an expansin, a laccase, aligninolytic enzyme, a pectinase, a peroxidase, a protease, a swollenin,or a combination or mixture thereof. Preferably, the nonionic surfactantis a polyethylene glycol sorbitan ester, polyethylene glycol ether,polyoxyethylene ether, a poly(propylene glycol)-block-poly(ethyleneglycol)-block-poly(propylene glycol), or mixture thereof, and has an HLBvalue between 10 and 22. Preferably the buffering agent comprises CAPS,CHES, HEPBS, HEPES, HEPPS, MOPS, MES, Tris, an organic acid or saltthereof, an inorganic acid or salt thereof, or a mixture thereof.

In a preferred embodiment, a cleaning composition is used to clean abacterial cellulose deposit according to a method comprising contactinga hard surface with a cleaning composition for a sufficient time to atleast partially degrade the bacterial cellulose deposit. Preferably thecleaning composition comprises from about 0.01 wt. % to about 2 wt. % ofan enzyme composition, from about 0.001 wt. % to about 7 wt. % of anonionic surfactant, from about 55 wt. % to about 97 wt. % of water; hasa pH of less than about 5; wherein the enzyme composition comprises acellulase, an AA9 polypeptide having cellulolytic enhancing activity, ahemicellulase, an esterase, an expansin, a laccase, a ligninolyticenzyme, a pectinase, a peroxidase, a protease, a swollenin, or acombination or mixture thereof; and wherein the nonionic surfactant hasan HLB value between 10 and 22. Preferably, the contact time is at leastabout 5 seconds. In a preferred embodiment, the hard surface is a drain,a floor, a sink, a beverage tower fluid line, or combination thereof.

While multiple embodiments are disclosed, still other embodiments maybecome apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detaileddescription, which shows and describes illustrative embodiments.Accordingly, the figures and detailed description are to be regarded asillustrative in nature and not restrictive.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1 is a scatter plot with a trend line from the testing in Example 1comparing the percent degradation of a sugar snake based on increasingHLB of the surfactant.

FIG. 2 is a bar graph from the testing in Example 3 evaluating thebaseline sugar snake degradation performance of four different enzymecompositions comprising a cellulase after 2 hours of contact time and 24hours of contact time.

FIG. 3A is a scatter plot from Example 4 comparing the percentdegradation of a sugar snake with DRAIN EASE FLOW versus DRAIN EASE FLOWand Tween-20.

FIG. 3B is a scatter plot from Example 4 comparing the percentdegradation of a sugar snake with Cellulase C versus Cellulase C andTween-20.

FIG. 3C is a scatter plot from Example 4 comparing the percentdegradation of a sugar snake with CELLUCLAST CONCENTRATED BG versusCELLUCLAST CONCENTRATED BG and Tween-20.

FIG. 4 is a line graph form Example 5 showing the enzyme stability byretained activity of an exemplary cleaning composition with differingstabilizers after incubation at 37° C. at 2-week intervals over an8-week period.

FIG. 5 is a table from Example 6 comparing percent degradation of asugar snake based on varying stabilizers and stabilizer concentrations.

Various embodiments of the exemplary cleaning compositions and methodsof using the cleaning compositions are represented in the figures.Reference to various embodiments does not limit the scope of theinvention. Figures represented herein are not limitations to the variousembodiments according to the invention and are presented for exemplaryillustration of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

The present disclosure relates to compositions comprising an enzymecomposition and a nonionic surfactant having an HLB value between 10 and22. These compositions are useful for cleaning of bacterial cellulosedeposits and such methods are described herein. The compositions havemany advantages over existing bacterial cellulose treatmentcompositions. For example, an advantage of the compositions is that theyprovide improved removal of bacterial cellulose deposits. It is afurther advantage that the compositions do not require PPE. Yet anotheradvantage of the compositions is that they have a synergistic reactionbetween the enzyme composition and surfactants that provides surprisingefficacy against bacterial cellulose deposits. Still a further advantageis that the compositions to preferably comprise less than about 0.5 wt.% active protein concentration, more preferably less than about 0.1 wt.% active protein concentration, while maintaining cleaning efficacy.

The embodiments described herein are not limited to particular bacterialcellulose deposits, which can vary in makeup and in location. It isfurther to be understood that all terminology used herein is for thepurpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intendedto be limiting in any manner or scope. For example, as used in thisspecification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an” and“the” can include plural referents unless the content clearly indicatesotherwise. Further, all units, prefixes, and symbols may be denoted inits SI accepted form.

Numeric ranges recited within the specification are inclusive of thenumbers defining the range and include each integer within the definedrange. Throughout this disclosure, various aspects of the compositionsand methods are presented in a range format. It should be understoodthat the description in range format is merely for convenience andbrevity and should not be construed as an inflexible limitation on thescope of the disclosure. Accordingly, the description of a range shouldbe considered to have specifically disclosed all the possiblesub-ranges, fractions, and individual numerical values within thatrange. For example, description of a range such as from 1 to 6 should beconsidered to have specifically disclosed sub-ranges such as from 1 to3, from 1 to 4, from 1 to 5, from 2 to 4, from 2 to 6, from 3 to 6 etc.,as well as individual numbers within that range, for example, 1, 2, 3,4, 5, and 6, and decimals and fractions, for example, 1.2, 3.8, 1½, and4¾. This applies regardless of the breadth of the range.

References to elements herein are intended to encompass any or all oftheir oxidative states and isotopes.

Definitions

So that the present disclosure may be more readily understood, certainterms are first defined. Unless defined otherwise, all technical andscientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonlyunderstood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which embodiments ofthe disclosure pertain. Many methods and materials similar, modified, orequivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice of theembodiments of the present disclosure without undue experimentation, thepreferred materials and methods are described herein. In describing andclaiming the embodiments of the present disclosure, the followingterminology will be used in accordance with the definitions set outbelow.

The term “about,” as used herein, refers to variation in the numericalquantity that can occur, for example, through typical measuringtechniques and equipment, with respect to any quantifiable variable,including, but not limited to, mass, volume, time, distance, wavelength, frequency, voltage, current, and electromagnetic field. Further,given solid and liquid handling procedures used in the real world, thereis certain inadvertent error and variation that is likely throughdifferences in the manufacture, source, or purity of the ingredientsused to make the compositions or carry out the methods and the like. Theterm “about” also encompasses amounts that differ due to differentequilibrium conditions for a composition resulting from a particularinitial mixture. The term “about” also encompasses these variations.Whether or not modified by the term “about,” the claims includeequivalents to the quantities.

As used herein, the term “oligomer” refers to a molecular complexcomprised of between one and ten monomeric units. For example, dimers,trimers, and tetramers, are considered oligomers. Furthermore, unlessotherwise specifically limited, the term “oligomer” shall include allpossible isomeric configurations of the molecule, including, but are notlimited to isotactic, syndiotactic and random symmetries, andcombinations thereof. Furthermore, unless otherwise specificallylimited, the term “oligomer” shall include all possible geometricalconfigurations of the molecule.

As used herein the term “polymer” refers to a molecular complexcomprised of more than ten monomeric units and generally includes, butis not limited to, homopolymers, copolymers, such as for example, block,graft, random and alternating copolymers, terpolymers, and higher“x”mers, further including their analogs, derivatives, combinations, andblends thereof. Furthermore, unless otherwise specifically limited, theterm “polymer” shall include all possible isomeric configurations of themolecule, including, but are not limited to isotactic, syndiotactic andrandom symmetries, and combinations thereof. Furthermore, unlessotherwise specifically limited, the term “polymer” shall include allpossible geometrical configurations of the molecule.

The methods and compositions of the present disclosure may comprise,consist essentially of, or consist of the components and ingredients ofthe present disclosure as well as other ingredients described herein. Asused herein, “consisting essentially of” means that the methods,systems, apparatuses and compositions may include additional steps,components or ingredients, but only if the additional steps, componentsor ingredients do not materially alter the basic and novelcharacteristics of the claimed methods, systems, apparatuses, andcompositions.

The term “actives” or “percent actives” or “percent by weight actives”or “actives concentration” are used interchangeably herein and refers tothe concentration of those ingredients involved in cleaning expressed asa percentage minus inert ingredients such as water or salts. It is alsosometimes indicated by a percentage in parentheses, for example,“chemical (10%).”

As used herein, the term “alkyl” or “alkyl groups” refers to saturatedhydrocarbons having one or more carbon atoms, including straight-chainalkyl groups (e.g., methyl, ethyl, propyl, butyl, pentyl, hexyl, heptyl,octyl, nonyl, decyl, etc.), cyclic alkyl groups (or “cycloalkyl” or“alicyclic” or “carbocyclic” groups) (e.g., cyclopropyl, cyclopentyl,cyclohexyl, cycloheptyl, cyclooctyl, etc.), branched-chain alkyl groups(e.g., isopropyl, tert-butyl, sec-butyl, isobutyl, etc.), andalkyl-substituted alkyl groups (e.g., alkyl-substituted cycloalkylgroups and cycloalkyl-substituted alkyl groups).

Unless otherwise specified, the term “alkyl” includes both“unsubstituted alkyls” and “substituted alkyls.” As used herein, theterm “substituted alkyls” refers to alkyl groups having substituentsreplacing one or more hydrogens on one or more carbons of thehydrocarbon backbone. Such substituents may include, for example,alkenyl, alkynyl, halogeno, hydroxyl, alkylcarbonyloxy, arylcarbonyloxy,alkoxycarbonyloxy, aryloxy, aryloxycarbonyloxy, carboxylate,alkylcarbonyl, arylcarbonyl, alkoxycarbonyl, aminocarbonyl,alkylaminocarbonyl, dialkylaminocarbonyl, alkylthiocarbonyl, alkoxyl,phosphate, phosphonato, phosphinato, cyano, amino (including alkylamino, dialkylamino, arylamino, diarylamino, and alkylarylamino),acylamino (including alkylcarbonylamino, arylcarbonylamino, carbamoyland ureido), imino, sulfhydryl, alkylthio, arylthio, thiocarboxylate,sulfates, alkylsulfinyl, sulfonates, sulfamoyl, sulfonamido, nitro,trifluoromethyl, cyano, azido, heterocyclic, alkylaryl, or aromatic(including heteroaromatic) groups.

In some embodiments, substituted alkyls can include a heterocyclicgroup. As used herein, the term “heterocyclic group” includes closedring structures analogous to carbocyclic groups in which one or more ofthe carbon atoms in the ring is an element other than carbon, forexample, nitrogen, sulfur or oxygen. Heterocyclic groups may besaturated or unsaturated. Exemplary heterocyclic groups include, but arenot limited to, aziridine, ethylene oxide (epoxides, oxiranes), thiirane(episulfides), dioxirane, azetidine, oxetane, thietane, dioxetane,dithietane, dithiete, azolidine, pyrrolidine, pyrroline, oxolane,dihydrofuran, and furan.

The term “weight percent,” “wt. %,” “wt. %,” “percent by weight,” “% byweight,” and variations thereof, as used herein, refer to theconcentration of a substance as the weight of that substance divided bythe total weight of the composition and multiplied by 100.

As used herein, the term “cleaning” refers to a method used tofacilitate or aid in soil removal, bleaching, microbial populationreduction, and any combination thereof. As used herein, the term“microorganism” refers to any noncellular or unicellular (includingcolonial) organism. Microorganisms include all prokaryotes.Microorganisms include bacteria (including cyanobacteria), spores,lichens, fungi, protozoa, virinos, viroids, viruses, phages, and somealgae. As used herein, the term “microbe” is synonymous withmicroorganism.

As used herein, the term “disinfectant” refers to an agent that killsall vegetative cells including most recognized pathogenicmicroorganisms, using the procedure described in A.O.A.C. Use DilutionMethods, Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of OfficialAnalytical Chemists, paragraph 955.14 and applicable sections, 15thEdition, 1990 (EPA Guideline 91-2). As used herein, the term “high leveldisinfection” or “high level disinfectant” refers to a compound orcomposition that kills substantially all organisms, except high levelsof bacterial spores, and is affected with a chemical germicide clearedfor marketing as a sterilant by the Food and Drug Administration. Asused herein, the term “intermediate-level disinfection” or “intermediatelevel disinfectant” refers to a compound or composition that killsmycobacteria, most viruses, and bacteria with a chemical germicideregistered as a tuberculocide by the Environmental Protection Agency(EPA). As used herein, the term “low-level disinfection” or “low leveldisinfectant” refers to a compound or composition that kills someviruses and bacteria with a chemical germicide registered as a hospitaldisinfectant by the EPA.

As used herein, the term “malodor,” is synonymous with phrases like“objectionable odor” and “offensive odor,” which refer to a sharp,pungent, or acrid odor or atmospheric environment from which a typicalperson withdraws if they are able to. Hedonic tone provides a measure ofthe degree to which an odor is pleasant or unpleasant. A “malodor” has ahedonic tone rating it as unpleasant as or more unpleasant than asolution of 5 wt. % acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid, ormixtures thereof.

For the purpose of this patent application, successful microbialreduction is achieved when the microbial populations are reduced by atleast about 50%, or by significantly more than is achieved by a washwith water. Larger reductions in microbial population provide greaterlevels of protection.

Differentiation of antimicrobial “-cidal” or “-static” activity, thedefinitions which describe the degree of efficacy, and the officiallaboratory protocols for measuring this efficacy are considerations forunderstanding the relevance of antimicrobial agents and compositions.Antimicrobial compositions can affect two kinds of microbial celldamage. The first is a lethal, irreversible action resulting in completemicrobial cell destruction or incapacitation. The second type of celldamage is reversible, such that if the organism is rendered free of theagent, it can again multiply. The former is termed microbiocidal and thelater, microbistatic. A sanitizer and a disinfectant are, by definition,agents which provide antimicrobial or microbiocidal activity. Incontrast, a preservative is generally described as an inhibitor ormicrobistatic composition

As used herein, the term “substantially free” refers to compositionscompletely lacking the component or having such a small amount of thecomponent that the component does not affect the performance of thecomposition. The component may be present as an impurity or as acontaminant and shall be less than 0.5 wt. %. In another embodiment, theamount of the component is less than 0.1 wt. % and in yet anotherembodiment, the amount of component is less than 0.01 wt. %.

The terms “water soluble” and “water dispersible” as used herein, meansthat the polymer is soluble or dispersible in water in the inventivecompositions. In general, the polymer should be soluble or dispersibleat 25° C. at a concentration of 0.0001% by weight of the water solutionand/or water carrier, preferably at 0.001%, more preferably at 0.01% andmost preferably at 0.1%.

The term “weight percent,” “wt. %,” “percent by weight,” “% by weight,”and variations thereof, as used herein, refer to the concentration of asubstance as the weight of that substance divided by the total weight ofthe composition and multiplied by 100. It is understood that, as usedhere, “percent,” “%,” and the like are intended to be synonymous with“weight percent,” “wt. %,” etc.

The methods, systems, apparatuses, and compositions of the presentdisclosure may comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of thecomponents and ingredients of the present disclosure as well as otheringredients described herein. As used herein, “consisting essentiallyof” means that the methods, systems, apparatuses and compositions mayinclude additional steps, components or ingredients, but only if theadditional steps, components or ingredients do not materially alter thebasic and novel characteristics of the claimed methods, systems,apparatuses, and compositions.

It should also be noted that, as used in this specification and theappended claims, the term “configured” describes a system, apparatus, orother structure that is constructed or configured to perform aparticular task or adopt a particular configuration. The term“configured” can be used interchangeably with other similar phrases suchas arranged and configured, constructed and arranged, adapted andconfigured, adapted, constructed, manufactured and arranged, and thelike.

Compositions

Preferably, the compositions comprise an enzyme composition, a nonionicsurfactant having an HLB value between 10 and 22, and water. In apreferred embodiment, the compositions further comprise a pH modifierand/or stabilizing agent. In a more preferred embodiment, thecompositions comprise an enzyme composition, a nonionic surfactanthaving an HLB value between about 13 and about 18, a pH modifier and/orstabilizing agent, and water. Preferably the compositions have a pHbetween about 2 and about 5. The compositions can be in concentratedform or a diluted ready to use form.

The compositions can be a premixed composition or a multi-part systemmixed prior to use or at the time of use. For example, a multi-partsystem, can be prepared with two, three, four, or more parts each havingdifferent components, that are combined and mixed prior to or at thetime of use. The premixed compositions and multi-part systems arepreferably concentrated compositions, which are diluted; however, insome embodiments they may be use concentrations. The concentratedcompositions can be in solid, liquid, or gel form. The ready to useforms can be in liquid or gel form. In a preferred embodiment, theconcentrated and ready-to-use compositions are liquid. In a preferredembodiment, the composition can be a dissolvable solid. Preferably thedissolvable solid can be added to a drain such that when fluid goes downthe drain the solid is partially dissolved forming a use solution thatcontacts the drain.

In a preferred embodiment, the concentrated compositions are prepared ata concentration that is 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 times theconcentration of the desired use solution. In an embodiment, theconcentrated composition is diluted at a ratio of between about 1:1 and1:10. Preferably, the concentrated compositions are diluted at a ratioof about 1:10, 1:9, 1:8, 1:7, 1:6, 1:5, 1:4, 1:3, 1:2, or 1:1.

Preferred embodiments of the compositions are described in Table 1below.

TABLE 1 Composition Preferred More Preferred Most Preferred Enzyme0.01-2   0.1-1.5 0.2-1   Composition (wt. %) Nonionic Surfactant0.001-7    0.01-5   0.1-4.5 (wt. %) Water (wt. %) 55-99 75-97 80-95Additional  0-35 0.1-30  0.5-25  Ingredients (wt. %)

Enzyme Composition

The compositions contain an enzyme composition. The enzyme compositionmay comprise one or more (e.g., several) enzymes comprising, consistingessentially of, or consisting of a cellulase, an AA9 polypeptide havingcellulolytic enhancing activity, a hemicellulase, an esterase, anexpansin, a laccase, a ligninolytic enzyme, a pectinase, a peroxidase, aprotease, a swollenin, or a combination or mixture thereof. Preferably,the enzyme composition comprises a cellulase. The cellulase ispreferably one or more (e.g., several) enzymes comprising, consistingessentially of, or consisting of an endoglucanase, a cellobiohydrolase,a beta-glucosidase, or a combination or mixture thereof. In anotheraspect, the hemicellulase is preferably one or more (e.g., several)enzymes comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of anacetylmannan esterase, an acetylxylan esterase, an arabinanase, anarabinofuranosidase, a coumaric acid esterase, a feruloyl esterase, agalactosidase, a glucuronidase, a glucuronoyl esterase, a mannanase, amannosidase, a xylanase, a xylosidase, or a combination or mixturethereof.

In an embodiment, the enzyme composition comprises a cellulolytic enzymecomposition comprising one or more (e.g., several) enzymes comprising,consisting essentially of, or consisting of a cellobiohydrolase, anendoglucanase, a beta glucosidase an AA9 polypeptide having cellulolyticenhancing activity, or a combination or mixture thereof. In a furtherembodiment, the enzyme composition comprises one or more cellulases andone or more hemicellulases.

One or more (e.g., several) of the enzymes may be wild-type proteins,recombinant proteins, or a combination of wild-type proteins andrecombinant proteins. For example, one or more (e.g., several) enzymesmay be native proteins of a cell, which is used as a host cell toexpress recombinantly the enzyme composition. The enzyme composition mayalso be a fermentation broth formulation or a cell composition.

The host cell may be any filamentous fungal cell useful in therecombinant production of an enzyme or protein. In an embodiment theenzyme composition is derived from a fungal host cell. In an embodimentthe fungal host cell is Trichoderma reesei. In one embodiment the enzymecomposition is or comprises an expression product of Trichoderma reesei.

In one embodiment the enzyme composition is or comprises a cellulolyticenzyme composition derived from Trichoderma reesei comprised ofTrichoderma reesei enzymes having cellulase activity and effective todegrade cellulose to, at least glucose. In one embodiment the enzymecomposition has an endoglucanase, and a cellobiohydrolase. In anotherembodiment the enzyme composition has an endoglucanase, acellobiohydrolase, and a beta-glucosidase. In a further embodiment theenzyme composition further comprises A. niger beta-glucosidase. In astill further embodiment the enzyme composition has an endoglucanase, acellobiohydrolase, a beta-glucosidase and an AA9 polypeptide havingcellulolytic enhancing activity.

In another embodiment the enzyme composition is a cellulolytic enzymecomposition comprising an AA9, a beta-glucosidase, a CBHI, and a CBHII.In a further embodiment the cellulolytic enzyme composition furthercomprises a xylanase and/or a xylosidase. In a further embodiment, thecellulolytic enzyme composition is a cellulolytic enzyme compositionderived from Trichoderma reesei further comprising a Penicillium sp.(emersonii) AA9 (GH61) polypeptide having cellulolytic enhancingactivity, an Aspergillus fumigatus beta-glucosidase variant, anAspergillus fumigatus cellobiohydrolase I, and an Aspergillus fumigatuscellobiohydrolase II. In a still further embodiment the cellulolyticenzyme composition further comprises an Aspergillus fumigatus xylanase,and an Aspergillus fumigatus beta-xylosidase. For example, the enzymecomposition is a composition described in WO 2013/028928.

In an embodiment the enzyme composition is or comprises a commercialenzyme preparation. Examples of commercial enzyme preparations suitablefor use in the compositions include, but are not limited to,ACCELLERASE® (Danisco US Inc.), ACCELLERASE® XY (Danisco US Inc.),ACCELLERASE® XC (Danisco US Inc.), ACCELLERASE® TRIO (Danisco US Inc.),ALTERNA FUEL 100P (Dyadic), ALTERNA FUEL 200P (Dyadic), CELLIC® CTec(Novozymes A/S), CELLIC® CTec2 (Novozymes A/S), CELLIC® Ctec3 (NovozymesA/S), CELLIC® HTec (Novozymes A/S), CELLIC® HTec2 (Novozymes A/S),CELLIC® HTec3 (Novozymes A/S), CELLUCLAST® (Novozymes A/S), CELLUCLASTCONCENTRATED BG® (Novozymes A/S), CELLUCLEAN CLASSIC 700T® (NovozymesA/S), CELLUZYME™ (Novozymes A/S), CEREFLO® (Novo Nordisk A/S), DEPOL™333P (Biocatalysts Limit, Wales, UK), DEPOL™ 740L. (Biocatalysts Limit,Wales, UK), DEPOL™ 762P (Biocatalysts Limit, Wales, UK), DRAIN EASEFLOW™ (Novozymes A/S), ECOPULP® TX-200A (Roal Oy LLC), FIBREZYME® LBR(Dyadic International, Inc.), FIBREZYME® LDI (Dyadic International,Inc.), LAM IN EX® (Danisco US Inc.), HSP 6000 Xylanase (DSM), MULTIFECT® Xylanase (Danisco US Inc.), PULPZYME® HC (Novozymes A/S),ROHAMENT® 7069 W (AB Enzymes), SHEARZYME™ (Novozymes A/S), SPEZYME® CP(Danisco US Inc.), ULTRAFLO® (Novozymes A/S), VISCOSTAR™ 150L (DyadicInternational, Inc.), or VISCOZYME® (Novozymes A/S).

Preferably, the compositions include from about 0.01 wt. % to about 2wt. % enzyme composition, more preferably from about 0.1 wt. % to about1.5 wt. % enzyme composition, and most preferably from about 0.2 wt. %to about 1 wt. % enzyme composition.

Nonionic Surfactant

The compositions contain a nonionic surfactant having an HLB valuebetween 10 and 22. Preferably, the HLB value is between about 11 andabout 20, more preferably between about 12 and about 19, most preferablybetween about 13 and about 18. Preferably, the surfactant is analkoxylated surfactant. Suitable alkoxylated surfactants include EO/POcopolymers, capped EO/PO copolymers, alcohol alkoxylates, capped alcoholalkoxylates, mixtures thereof, or the like. Preferred surfactants,including, but are not limited to, alcohol ethoxylates, polyethyleneglycol sorbitan ester, polyethylene glycol ether, polyoxyethylene ether,a poly(propylene glycol)-block-poly(ethyleneglycol)-block-poly(propylene glycol), poly(ethyleneglycol)-block-poly(propylene glycol)-block-poly(ethylene glycol), ormixture thereof so long as the surfactant selected has an HLB valuebetween 10 and 22. Suitable alkoxylated surfactants for use as solventsinclude EO/PO block copolymers, such as the Pluronic and reversePluronic surfactants; alcohol alkoxylates, such as Dehypon LS-54(R-(EO)₅(PO)₄) and Dehypon LS-36 (R-(EO)₃(PO)₆); and capped alcoholalkoxylates, such as Plurafac LF221 and Tegoten EC11; mixtures thereof,or the like.

Preferred surfactants include, but are not limited to, polyethyleneglycol sorbitan monolaurate (commercially available as Tween 20 fromSigma-Aldrich), polyethylene glycol sorbitan monooleate (commerciallyavailable as Tween 80 from Sigma-Aldrich), polyethylene glycoltert-octylphenyl ether (commercially available as Triton X-100 fromSigma-Aldrich), polyethylene glycol trimethylnonyl ether (commerciallyavailable as Tergitol TMN-6 from Sigma-Aldrich), poly(propyleneglycol)-block-poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(propylene glycol)(commercially available as Pluronic 10R5 from Sigma-Aldrich, preferablyhaving an average molecular weight of 1950), polyoxyethylene (23) laurylether (commercially available as Brij L23 from Sigma-Aldrich), andmixtures thereof.

Preferably, the compositions include from about 0.001 wt. % to about 7wt. % nonionic surfactant, more preferably from about 0.01 wt. % toabout 5 wt. % nonionic surfactant, still more preferably from about 0.1wt. % to about 4.5 wt. %, and most preferably from about 1 wt. % toabout 4 wt. % nonionic surfactant.

pH

In an acidic embodiment, the compositions preferably have a pH equal toor less than about 5, more preferably, between about 2 and about 4.75,most preferably between about 3 and about 4.5. It has been found thatthe compositions lose stability at a pH of above 5 with most buffers andstabilizers. However, using the buffer CAPS it was found that thecompositions perform well at a pH of between about 8 and about 11, morepreferably between about 9 and about 10.5, most preferably at a pH ofabout 10. In an embodiment having a multi-part system combined prior toor at the time of use, the compositions can be prepared with a pHbetween about 2 and about 11. However, if the pH is between about 4.5and about 8, the stability of the compositions may require use fairlyquickly after combining the different parts. Thus, in a preferredembodiment having a pH between 4.5 and 8, the compositions are used nomore than 2 hours, 90 minutes, 60 minutes, 45 minutes, 30 minutes, 25minutes, 20 minutes, 15 minutes, 10 minutes, 5 minutes, 4 minutes, 3minutes, 2 minutes, or 1 minute, after combination.

Water

The compositions contain water. In a preferred embodiment comprisingwater as a carrier, the water is deionized water or softened water.

The water typically makes up the remaining volume after the addition ofall other ingredients. Preferably, the compositions include from about55 wt. % to about 99 wt. % water, more preferably from about 75 wt. % toabout 97 wt. % water, and most preferably from about 80 wt. % to about95 wt. % water.

Additional Optional Ingredients

The compositions can include a number of optional ingredients in variousembodiments. Many additional optional ingredients can be added toprovide desired properties to the compositions. Optional ingredients caninclude, but are not limited to, a buffering agent, a colorant, anadditional enzyme, a fragrance, a pH modifier, a stabilizing agent, anadditional surfactant, a thickening agent, and mixtures thereof.

Buffering Agent

The compositions can optionally include a buffering agent. As usedherein the term “buffer” and “buffering agent” are synonymous. Preferredbuffering agents include, but are not limited to,N-cyclohexyl-3-aminopropanesulfonic acid (CAPS),N-cyclohexyl-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid (CHES),N-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazine-N′-(4-butanesulfonic acid) (HEPBS),4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES),3-[4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazinyl]propanesulfonic acid (HEPPS),3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid (MOPS),2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES), pH modifiers (discussedbelow), tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris), and mixtures thereof.Most preferred buffers, include CAPS, CHES, citric acid and its salts(including in particular sodium citrate), and mixtures thereof.Specifically, CAPS and CHES are most preferred for alkaline pH andcitric acid, citrate, acetic acid, and acetate are most preferred foracidic pH.

Preferably, the compositions include from about 0.1 wt. % to about 5 wt.% buffering agent, more preferably from about 0.5 wt. % to about 3 wt. %buffering agent, and most preferably from about 1 wt. % to about 2 wt. %buffering agent.

Colorant

The compositions can optionally comprise a colorant. The colorant can bea dye or an additive that provides a visible color or color change.Preferred colorants, including, but are not limited to, copper(II)salts, Direct Blue 86, available from Mac Dye-Chem Industries,Ahmedabad, India; Fastusol Blue, available from Mobay ChemicalCorporation, Pittsburgh, Pa.; Acid Orange 7, available from AmericanCyanamid Company, Wayne, N.J.; Basic Violet 10 and Sandolan Blue/AcidBlue 182, available from Sandoz, Princeton, N.J.; Acid Yellow 23,available from Chemos GmbH, Regenstauf, Germany; Acid Yellow 17,available from Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, Mo.; Sap Green and MetanilYellow, available from Keyston Analine and Chemical, Chicago, Ill.; AcidBlue 9, available from Emerald Hilton Davis, LLC, Cincinnati, Ohio;Hisol Fast Red and Fluorescein, available from Capitol Color andChemical Company, Newark, N.J.; and Acid Green 25, Ciba SpecialtyChemicals Corporation, Greenboro, N.C.

Preferably the colorant can be in a concentration between about 0 wt. %and about 2 wt. %, more preferably between about 0.001 wt. % and about 1wt. %.

Additional Enzyme

The compositions can optionally include an additional enzyme. Suitableadditional enzymes, include, but are not limited to, a protease, axylanase, a nuclease, and mixtures thereof. If the compositions containan additional enzyme, it is preferably in a concentration from about0.01 wt. % to about 2 wt. %, more preferably from about 0.1 wt. % toabout 1.5 wt. %, and most preferably from about 0.5 wt. % to about 1 wt.%.

Fragrance

The compositions can optionally comprise a fragrance. Preferredfragrances include, but are not limited to, terpenoids such ascitronellol, aldehydes such as amyl cinnamaldehyde, a jasmine such asC1S-jasmine or jasmal, vanillin, and the like. Preferably the fragrancecan be in a concentration between about 0 wt. % and about 1 wt. %, morepreferably between about 0.01 wt. % and about 1 wt. %.

pH Modifier

The compositions can include a pH modifier to adjust the pH or act as abuffer. Suitable pH modifiers can include water soluble acids. Preferredacids can be organic and/or inorganic acids and their salts that arewater soluble.

Preferred inorganic acids include, but are not limited to, boric acid,hydrobromic acid, hydrochloric acid, hydrofluoric acid, hydroiodic acid,hypophosphorous acid, phosphoric acid, phosphorous acid, polyphosphoricacid, sulfamic acid, sulfuric acid, sulfurous acid, sodium bisulfate,sodium bisulfite, their salts and mixtures thereof.

Preferred organic acids include, but are not limited to, acetic acid,acrylic acids, adipic acid, benzoic acid, butyric acid, caproic acid,citric acid, formic acid, fumaric acid, gluconic acid or its precursorglucono-δ-lactone, glutaric acid, hydroxy acetic acid, isophthalic acid,lactic acid, lauric acid, maleic acid, malic acid, malonic acid,palmitic acid, pimelic acid, polymaleic-acrylic acids, polyacrylicacids, propionic acid, sebacic acid, stearic acid, suberic acid,succinic acid, tartaric acid, terephthalic acid, uric acid, valericacid, their salts and mixtures thereof. Preferred acid salts include,but are not limited to, acetic acid salts, citric acid salts, formicacid salts, and mixtures thereof.

Preferably, the compositions include from about 0.1 wt. % to about 5 wt.% pH modifier, more preferably from about 0.5 wt. % to about 3 wt. % pHmodifier, and most preferably from about 1 wt. % to about 2 wt. % pHmodifier.

Stabilizing Agent

The compositions can optionally comprise a stabilizing agent. Preferredstabilizing agents include, but are not limited to, borate,calcium/magnesium ions, glycerol, polyethylene glycol 200, polyethyleneglycol 400, propylene glycol, sucrose, and mixtures thereof. When thecompositions include a stabilizing agent, it can be included in anamount that provides the desired level of stability to the composition.

Preferably, the compositions include from about 0.01 wt. % to about 30wt. % stabilizing agent, more preferably from about 0.5 wt. % to about25 wt. % stabilizing agent, and most preferably from about 1 wt. % toabout 25 wt. % stabilizing agent.

Additional Surfactant

In some embodiments, the compositions include an additional surfactantbesides the nonionic surfactant having an HLB between 10 and 22.Additional surfactants suitable for use in the compositions include, butare not limited to, anionic surfactants, cationic surfactants, nonionicsurfactants, and zwitterionic surfactants. Preferred additionalsurfactants, include, but are not limited to, nonionic seed oilsurfactants, such as the alcohol ethoxylate Ecosurf SA-9 (commerciallyavailable from DOW Chemical), cocamidopropyl betaine (commerciallyavailable as Amphosol CG from Stepan), cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine(commercially available as Macham 50-SB from Solvay), alkylpolyglucosides, including, for example decyl glucoside (commerciallyavailable as APG 325N from BASF), cocoamine oxide (commerciallyavailable as Barlox 12 from Lonza), sodium xylene sulfonate, ethyleneoxide/propylene oxide block copolymers, such as the Pluronic surfactantline available from BASF (such as Pluronic 25R and Pluronic 10R5),cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine (commercially available as Mackam 50-SBfrom Solvay), and mixtures thereof.

When the compositions include an additional surfactant, preferably it isin a concentration from about 0.01 wt. % to about 5 wt. %.

Thickening Agent

The compositions can optionally include a thickening agent. A widevariety of thickening agents can be included. Preferred thickeningagents can be organic or inorganic. When a thickening agent is included,it is preferably in an amount between about 0.01 wt. % and about 5 wt.%.

Preferred organic thickening agents include, but are not limited to,acrylic copolymers, carboxyvinyl polymers, corn starch, crosslinkedpolyacrylic acid-type thickening agents, fatty acid thixotropicthickeners, guar gum, guar hydroxy propyltrimonium chloride,polyacrylate polymers, poly(methylvinylether/maleic) anhydride polymers,and mixtures thereof.

As used herein, “polyacrylic acid-type” is intended to refer to watersoluble homopolymers of acrylic acid or methacrylic acid orwater-dispersible or water-soluble salts, esters and amides thereof, orwater-soluble copolymers of these acids or their salts, esters or amideswith each other or with one or more ethylenically unsaturated monomers,such as styrene, maleic acid, maleic anhydride, 2-hydroxyethylacrylate,acrylonitrile, vinyl acetate, ethylene, propylene, or the like.Preferably, the polyacrylic thickening agent is one of the crosslinkedpolyacrylic acid-type thickening agents commercially available asCARBOPOL™. The CARBOPOL™ resins, also known as carbomer resins, arehydrophilic, high molecular weight, crosslinked acrylic acid polymers.The CARBOPOL™ resins are crosslinked with a polyalkenyl polyether, suchas a polyalkyl ether of sucrose having an average of 5.8 alkyl groupsper molecule of sucrose. Other suitable carbomer thickening agentsinclude the PNC carbomers.

Suitable fatty acid thixotropic thickeners, include, but are not limitedto, higher aliphatic fatty monocarboxylic acids having from about 8 toabout 22 carbon atoms, inclusive of the carbon atom of the carboxylgroup of the fatty acid. The aliphatic radicals are saturated and can bestraight or branched. Mixtures of fatty acids may be used, such as thosederived from natural sources, such as tallow fatty acid, coco fattyacid, soya fatty acid, etc., or from synthetic sources available fromindustrial manufacturing processes.

Examples of the fatty acids which can be used as thickeners include, forexample, decanoic acid, lauric acid, dodecanoic acid, palmitic acid,myristic acid, stearic acid, oleic acid, eicosanoic acid, tallow fattyacid, coco fatty acid, soya fatty acid and mixtures of these acids. Themetal salts of the above fatty acids can also be used in as thixotropicthickener agents, such as salts of the monovalent and polyvalent metalssuch as sodium, potassium, magnesium, calcium, aluminum and zinc.Suitable metal salts, include, but are not limited to, aluminum salts intriacid form, e.g., aluminum tristearate, Al(OCOC₁₇H₃₅)₃, monoacidsalts, e.g., aluminum monostearate, Al(OH)₂(OCOC₁₇H₃₅) and diacid salts,e.g. aluminum distearate, Al(OH)(OCOC₁₇H₃₅)₂, and mixtures of two orthree of the mono-, di- and triacid salts can be used for those metals,e.g., Al, with valences of +3, and mixtures of the mono- and diacidsalts can be used for those metals, e.g., Zn, with valences of +2.

The thickening agent used can also be any one of a number of natural orsynthetic inorganic materials, such as clays, silicas, aluminas,titanium dioxide (pyrogenic) and calcium and/or magnesium oxides. All ofthese materials are readily available from commercial sources.

Various types of clays which are useful include kaolins such askaolinite, dicktite, nacrite, halloysite and endillite; serpentine clayssuch as chrysotile and amesite; smectites such as montmorillonite(derived from bentonite rock), beidellite, nontronite, hectorite,saponite and sauconite; illites or micas; glauconite; chlorites andvermiculites; attapulgite and sepiolite. Mixed layer clays exhibitingintercalation of mineral sandwiches with one another may be used, suchas, for example, mixed-layer clay mineral sheets of illite interspersedrandomly or regularly with montmorillonite, or chlorite with one of theother types of clay, such as vermiculite. Other useful clays includeamorphous clays, such as allophone and imogolite, and high-alumina clayminerals such as diaspore, boehmite, bibbsite and cliachite. Varioustypes of silicas which are useful include diatomite, precipitated silicaand fumed silica. Various types of aluminas may be used, as well asvarious types of calcium and magnesium oxides.

Methods of Preparing the Compositions

The compositions can be prepared by adding and mixing the desiredingredients. Preferably the ingredients are mixed until they arehomogeneous or substantially homogenous. The compositions can beprepared manually or by a system that adds the components in desiredquantities to achieve a particular concentration of ingredients. In apreferred embodiment, the compositions are prepared as a concentratedcomposition and diluted on site prior or during use. In a preferredembodiment, the ingredients are mixed at the time of use prior tocontacting a surface or at the time of contacting a surface to becleaned. The compositions can be prepared as a multi

Methods of Using the Compositions

The compositions can be used by contacting a hard surface, preferably adrain, with the composition. Typically, the hard surface has a bacterialcellulose deposit or may be susceptible to the development of abacterial cellulose deposit. Such hard surfaces, including, but are notlimited to, drains, floors, sinks, beverage tower fluid lines, orcombination thereof. In an aspect of the method of use, the compositioncan be allowed to contact the hard surface for a sufficient time to atleast partially degrade the bacterial cellulose deposit, whereby the atleast partially degraded material is removed from the hard surface. Inanother aspect of the method of use, the composition is allowed to coatthe hard surface to prevent or at least reduce the development of abacterial cellulose deposit.

In one embodiment of the present method used to remove or preventbacterial cellulose deposits is added directly to a hard surface,preferably a drain system through an opening in the system, such as afloor drain or any other opening that will allow access to the draininterior. Preferably the composition is in contact with the hard surfacefor a time prior to use or rinsing of at least about 1 second, 2seconds, 3 seconds, 4 seconds, 5 seconds, 6 seconds, 7 seconds, 8seconds, 9 seconds, 10 seconds, 11 seconds, 12 seconds, 13 seconds 14seconds, 15 seconds, 20 seconds, 25 seconds, 30 seconds, 35 seconds, 40seconds, 45 seconds, 50 seconds, 55 seconds, 1 minute, 90 seconds, 2minutes, 3 minutes, 4 minutes, 5 minutes, 6 minutes, 7 minutes, 8minutes, 9 minutes, 10 minutes, 11 minutes, 12 minutes, 13 minutes, 14minutes, 15 minutes, 20 minutes, 25 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 1hour, 2 hours, 3, hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, 6 hours, 7 hours, 8 hours, 9hours, 10 hours, 11 hours, 12 hours, 13 hours, 14 hours, 15 hours, 16hours, 17 hours, 18 hours, 19 hours, 20 hours, 21 hours, 22 hours, 23hours, 24 hours, 30 hours, 36 hours, 48 hours, 60 hours, 72 hours.

Optionally, the hard surface can be rinsed after allowing thecomposition to contact the hard surface for sufficient time. In apreferred embodiment, the hard surface is not rinsed after contact withthe composition. In another preferred embodiment, the hard surface isrinsed with water. The water can have a temperature between 10° C. andabout 100° C., preferably between about 25° C. and about 90° C., morepreferably between about 35° C. and about 80° C.

The method of use requires no particular mode of contacting thecomposition to the bacterial cellulose deposit to be removed, providedthe contact takes place for a time sufficient to allow at least partialdegradation of the bacterial cellulose deposit. Optionally, thebacterial cellulose can be removed with minimal mechanical or manualeffort, such as by flushing or rinsing, by gentle mechanical agitation,or by continued use of the compositions described herein. Preferably,the composition is permitted to contact the deposits for at least two tothree hours.

The drain cleaners, compositions, and methods can be applied to effectboth prevention and removal of bacterial cellulose deposits. When usedto clean drain pipes, such as soft drink and alcoholic beverage stationdrain pipes, the condition of the drain must be ascertained, i.e.,whether the drain is fully or partially clogged. If fully clogged, thedrain can be partially unblocked, typically by mechanical means such assnaking, rotor rooting, water jetting, etc., to allow the composition tocontact as much of the deposited bacterial cellulose as possible.However, it is also possible to apply the compositions to a fullyclogged drain in small amounts repeatedly as it degrades the bacterialcellulose deposit.

In a preferred embodiment, the compositions provide a synergisticdegradation of bacterial cellulose deposits. Further, they can provideremoval of malodor and have a cidal effect on insects, particularlyflies, that tend to feed off of bacterial cellulose deposits.

All publications and patent applications in this specification areindicative of the level of ordinary skill in the art to which thisdisclosure pertains. All publications and patent applications are hereinincorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individualpublication or patent application was specifically and individuallyindicated as incorporated by reference.

EXAMPLES

Embodiments of the present disclosure are further defined in thefollowing non-limiting Examples. It should be understood that theseExamples, while indicating certain embodiments, are given by way ofillustration only. From the above discussion and these Examples, oneskilled in the art can ascertain the essential characteristics of thecompositions and methods, and without departing from the spirit andscope thereof, can make various changes and modifications to adapt it tovarious usages and conditions. Thus, various modifications of theembodiments, in addition to those shown and described herein, will beapparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing description.Such modifications are also intended to fall within the scope of theappended claims.

The materials used in the following Examples are provided herein:

Amphosol CG: an amphoteric surfactant, cocamidopropyl betaine, availablefrom Stepan.

APG 325N: a nonionic surfactant, alkyl polyglucoside (decyl glucoside)having an HLB of about 13, available from BASF Corp.

Barlox 12: a zwitterionic surfactant, cocoamine oxide, available fromLonza.

Bioterge AS-40K: an anionic surfactant, sodium C14-16 alpha olefinsulfonate, available from Stepan.

Brij L23: a nonionic surfactant, polyoxyethylene (23) lauryl etherhaving an HLB of 17, available from Sigma-Aldrich.

Biological Formula 2-24 Instant Drosophila Medium: a culture mediumavailable from Carolina.

Cellulase C: an exemplary enzyme composition comprising a cellulaseenzyme obtained from Novozymes. Cellulase C comprises between 70 wt. %and about 75 wt. % water, between 10 wt. % and about 20 wt. % cellulase,between about 5 wt. % and about 15 wt. % sorbitol, and less than 1 wt. %proxel.

CELLUCLAST CONCENTRATED BG: an exemplary enzyme composition availablefrom Novozymes.

CELLUCLEAN CLASSIC 700T: an exemplary enzyme composition available fromNovozymes.

DRAIN EASE FLOW: an exemplary enzyme composition comprising a cellulaseenzyme obtained from Novozymes. DRAIN EASE FLOW comprises water, apolysaccharide, a cellulase, sodium benzoate, and potassium sorbate. Thewater comprises between about 40 wt. % and about 50 wt. % of the enzymecomposition. The polysaccharide comprises between about 25 wt. % andabout 35 wt. % of the enzyme composition. The polysaccharide comprisessucrose, glucose, or a mixture thereof. The cellulase comprises betweenabout 20 wt. % and about 25 wt. % of the enzyme composition.

Ecosurf SA-9: a nonionic alcohol ethoxylate seed oil surfactant havingan HLB of 11-13, available from DOW Chemical.

Mackam 50-SB: a zwitterionic surfactant, cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine,available from Solvay.

PEG 200: a polyethylene glycol available from a number of commercialsources including, Sigma-Aldrich.

Pluronic F108: a nonionic surfactant, ethylene oxide and propylene oxideblock copolymer having an HLB greater than 24, available from BASF.

Pluronic L31: a nonionic surfactant, ethylene oxide and propylene oxideblock copolymer having an HLB of 1-7, available from BASF.

Pluronic 10R5: a nonionic surfactant, poly(propyleneglycol)-block-poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(propylene glycol) havingan HLB of 12-18, available from Sigma-Aldrich.

Pluronic 25R: a nonionic surfactant, ethylene oxide and propylene oxideblock copolymer having an HLB of 7-12, available from BASF.

Sodium xylene sulfonate (SXS), an anionic surfactant available frommultiple commercial sources.

Tergitol NP-12: a nonionic nonylphenol ethoxylate having an HLB of 13.8,available from DOW Chemical.

Tergitol TMN-6: a nonionic surfactant, polyethylene glycoltrimethylnonyl ether having an HLB of 13.1, available from DOW Chemical.

Triton X-100: a nonionic surfactant, polyethylene glycoltert-octylphenyl ether having an HLB of 13.5, available fromSigma-Aldrich.

Tween 20: a nonionic surfactant, polyethylene glycol sorbitanmonolaurate having an HLB of 16.7, available from Sigma-Aldrich.

Tween 80: a nonionic surfactant, polyethylene glycol sorbitan monooleatehaving an HLB of 15, available from Sigma-Aldrich.

Additional ingredients available from a number of sources include,citric acid, glycerol, sodium citrate, and water (5 grain).Concentration percentages of ingredients provided in the Examples beloware in weight percent unless indicated as percent active.

Example 1

In order to test interactions between enzyme compositions comprisingcellulase(s) and detergent components the “Cellulase catalyzedhydrolysis of bacterial cellulose” method was used. For this method, thesugar snake is weighed before and after treatment with the listedchemistry. The percent sugar snake degraded after two hours wascalculated and recorded. The general formulation is listed in Table 2below.

TABLE 2 Concentration Component Species (wt. %) Buffer Citric Acid (50%)1.12% Buffer Trisodium Citrate  0.6% Surfactant See Table 3  0-4% EnzymeDRAIN EASE FLOW  0.5% Water 5 grain Q.S.Aside from enzyme RM, all percentages are percent active concentrations.The type of surfactant was varied and compared to the controlformulation which did not contain surfactant. If the amount of sugarsnake degraded after a set time was statistically greater than thecontrol reaction across replicate tests it was deemed synergistic. Ifthe amount of degradation was comparable the surfactant interaction wasdeemed compatible, and if the amount of degradation was less than thecontrol the surfactant interaction was deemed less favorable. Theresults are provided below in Table 3 showing the percent degradation ofthe sugar snake an assessment of the enzyme compatibility.

TABLE 3 Degradation Compatibility Surfactant HLB Increase (%) RatingPluronic L31 1-7 0.22 Compatible Pluronic 10R5 12-18 20 SynergisticTergitol TMN-6 13.1 20.6 Synergistic Triton X-100 13.5 30.1 SynergisticTween 80 15 21.9 Synergistic Tween 20 16.7 20.4 Synergistic Brij L23 1710.6 Synergistic Pluronic F108 >24 −0.9* Compatible *Pluronic F108 wasnot statistically different than the no-surfactant controlThe results from Table 3 are also shown in FIG. 1. As can be seen inTable 3 and in FIG. 1, nonionic surfactants with HLB values ranging fromabout 10-22 showed enhanced performance, with unexpected synergy in therange of about 13 HLB to about 18 HLB. The data also shows that PluronicL31 (HLB 1-7) and Pluronic F108 (>24) were not statistically differentfrom the no-surfactant control.

Example 2

Another wider test was completed using a method in which a piece ofsugar snake (weight previously recorded) was incubated in chemistrycontaining surfactant. After a set time, the remaining sugar snake wasremoved and quantified by water displacement in a graduated cylinder.After treatment, sugar snake degradation was determined by subtractingthe volume (mL) of water displacement from the starting weight (grams).Each variation was compared to a control where the surfactant wasomitted. The same three terms as above (synergistic, compatible, andless favorable) were used to identify the enzyme compatibility of eachsurfactant. Results are shown in Table 4.

TABLE 4 Percent Compat- Concentration Incubation Degrada- ibilitySurfactant (wt. %) pH Time (hr) tion Rating Tergitol 4 4 24 61 LessNP-12 Favorable Ecosurf 4 4 8 85 Compatible SA-9 Amphosol 4 4 8 54Compatible CG Mackam 4 4 8 51 Compatible 50-SB Bioterge 4 4 8 27 LessAS-40K Favorable APG 4 4 7 85 Compatible 325N APG 4 10 7 43 Less 325NFavorable Barlox 12 4 4 7 85 Compatible Barlox 12 4 10 7 16 LessFavorable SXS 4 4 7 85 Compatible SXS 2 4 7 11 Compatible Pluronic 4 4 858 Compatible 25R

Example 3

Multiple enzyme compositions comprising a cellulase were evaluated todetermine sugar snake degradation performance as a baseline withoutpotential surfactant synergy to assess the role of the enzymecomposition versus improvement based on surfactant synergy. Compositionswere prepared with 0.5 wt. % enzyme composition, 1.7 wt. % sodiumcitrate buffer, and water at a pH of 4.25. The four enzyme compositionstested were obtained from Novozymes and included: DRAIN EASE FLOW,CELLUCLEAN CLASSIC 700T, CELLUCLAST CONCENTRATED BG, and Cellulase C. Asugar snake of equal mass was measured and the cleaning compositionswere applied to it. The percent degradation of the sugar snake (based onmass) was evaluated after 2 hours of contact and after 24 hours ofcontact. The percent degradation is shown in FIG. 2 where 100 indicates100% degradation. As can be seen in FIG. 2, CELLUCLAST CONCENTRATED BGprovided the best sugar snake degradation at both the 2-hour time and24-hour time. DRAIN EASE FLOW and Cellulase C performed substantiallysimilar and CELLUCLEAN CLASSIC 700T did not appear to degrade the sugarsnake at all.

Example 4

The three enzyme compositions that had a good baseline were tested in anexemplary cleaning composition containing Tween 20 to assess which wouldexhibit synergistic performance with a surfactant. Compositions wereprepared with 0.5 wt. % enzyme composition, 1.7 wt. % sodium citratebuffer, 2 wt. % Tween 20, and water at a pH of 4.25. The three enzymecompositions tested were DRAIN EASE FLOW, CELLUCLAST CONCENTRATED BG,and Cellulase C, all from Novozymes. Control compositions were alsoprepared without the surfactant (Tween 20) having 0.5 wt. % enzymecomposition, 1.7 wt. % sodium citrate buffer, and water at a pH of 4.25.A sugar snake of equal mass was measured and the cleaning compositionswere applied to it. The percent degradation of the sugar snake (based onmass) was evaluated after 2 hours of contact and after 18 hours ofcontact. The percent degradation is shown in FIGS. 3A-3C where 100indicates 100% degradation.

As can be seen in FIGS. 3A-3C, all three of the enzyme compositionsdemonstrated synergistic improvement with the surfactant added. DRAINEASE FLOW and CELLUCLAST CONCENTRATED BG both degraded the sugar snakeentirely after 18 hours. The observed synergy became more apparent withincreased incubation time. T-tests were done on all the data to assessstatistical improvement. The results of the t-test are summarized inTable 5.

TABLE 5 Difference 95% Confidence Cellulase RM (+/−2% Tween 20) p valueInterval Drain Ease Flow −27.30% 0.032 −48.8-5.9 Cellulase C −42.70%0.02 −69.3, 16.0 Celluclast Conc −25.00% 0.039 −47.1, −3.0 BGThe T-test analysis shows that each sample had a statistical differencebetween +/−2% Tween 20 at 18 hours incubation time.

Example 5

Enzyme stability was tested in cleaning compositions prepared withdiffering stabilizers. All test compositions were prepared containing0.5% DRAIN EASE FLOW, 2% Tween 20, and 1.8% sodium citrate buffer inwater prepared at a pH of about 4.5 Enzyme stability was assessed by anactivity assay. The results are provided in FIG. 4. Formulationscontaining 20% PEG 400 and 20% glycerol showed 84% and 83% retention ofDRAIN EASE FLOW activity after 8 weeks at 37° C. Formulations containing20% propylene glycol showed 100% retention of DRAIN EASE FLOW activityunder the same conditions. Indicating the stabilizers did provide enzymestability and retention.

Example 6

DRAIN EASE FLOW performance was also assessed using the “Cellulasecatalyzed hydrolysis of bacterial cellulose” test at increasingstabilizer concentrations. The initial screening was done using about 1gram of sugar snake dosed at 20 mL/gram chemistry. The relative enzymeperformance was determined at each concentration by comparing theperformance to control formulations lacking stabilizer. The percentdegradation is shown in FIG. 5 where 100 indicates 100% degradation andN/A indicates immediate precipitation upon the addition of the enzyme.Of all the potential stabilizers tested, glucose showed the highestinhibition whereas PEG 200 had the lowest impact on performance. Afterincubating sugar snake for 24 hours in exemplary cleaning compositions,the samples were visually assessed for amount of sugar snake remaining.Formulations containing 0.5% DRAIN EASE FLOW, 2% Tween 20, and 1.8%sodium citrate buffer in water prepared at a pH of about 4.5 were foundto fully degrade the sugar snake. Formulations containing 20% PEG 200,20% PEG 400, and 20% sucrose, respectively, were also each found tofully degraded the sugar snake. Formulations containing otherstabilizers did not result in complete degradation of sugar snake evenafter 24 hours despite fairly high performance after 2 hours.

The inventions being thus described, it will be obvious that the samemay be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as adeparture from the spirit and scope of the inventions and all suchmodifications are intended to be included within the scope of thefollowing claims. The above specification provides a description of themanufacture and use of the disclosed compositions and methods. Sincemany embodiments can be made without departing from the spirit and scopeof the invention, the invention resides in the claims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A composition for cleaning bacterial cellulosedeposits comprising: from about 0.01 wt. % to about 2 wt. % of an enzymecomposition comprising one or more of the following: a cellulase, an AA9polypeptide having cellulolytic enhancing activity, a hemicellulase, anesterase, an expansin, a laccase, a ligninolytic enzyme, a pectinase, aperoxidase, a protease, and a swollenin; from about 0.01 wt. % to about7 wt. % of a nonionic surfactant, wherein the nonionic surfactant has anHLB value between 13 and 18; from about 0.01 wt. % to about 30 wt. % ofa stabilizing agent comprising glycerol, polyethylene glycol 200,polyethylene glycol 400, propylene glycol, sucrose, or a mixturethereof; and from about 55 wt. % to about 97 wt. % of water; wherein thecomposition has a pH between about 2 and about
 11. 2. The composition ofclaim 1, wherein the nonionic surfactant an alcohol ethoxylate, apolyethylene glycol sorbitan ester, a polyethylene glycol ether, apolyoxyethylene ether, a poly(propylene glycol)-block-poly(ethyleneglycol)-block-poly(propylene glycol), a poly(ethyleneglycol)-block-poly(propylene glycol)-block-poly(ethylene glycol), ormixture thereof.
 3. The composition of claim 1, wherein the compositionfurther comprises a buffering agent at a concentration from about 0.1wt. % to about 5 wt. %; wherein the buffering agent comprises CAPS,CHES, HEPBS, HEPES, HEPPS, MOPS, MES, Tris, an organic acid or saltthereof, an inorganic acid or salt thereof, or a mixture thereof.
 4. Thecomposition of claim 3, wherein the buffering agent comprises aceticacid, acetate, citric acid, citrate, CAPS, CUES, or mixture thereof. 5.The composition of claim 1, wherein the cellulase comprises acellobiohydrolase, an endoglucanase, a beta glucosidase, or acombination or mixture thereof.
 6. The composition of claim 5, whereinthe cellulase is derived from an expression product of Trichodermareesei.
 7. The composition of claim 1, wherein the composition has a pHless than about
 5. 8. The composition of claim 1, wherein thecomposition is a multi-part system.
 9. The composition of claim 1,wherein the composition further comprises a colorant an additionalenzyme, a fragrance, an additional surfactant, a thickening agent, or amixture thereof.
 10. A composition for cleaning bacterial cellulosedeposits comprising: from about 0.01 wt. % to about 2 wt. % of an enzymecomposition comprising one or more of the following: a cellulase, an AA9polypeptide having cellulolytic enhancing activity, a hemicellulase, anesterase, an expansin, a laccase, a ligninolytic enzyme, a pectinase, aperoxidase, a protease, and a swollenin; from about 0.01 wt. % to about7 wt. % of a nonionic surfactant, wherein the nonionic surfactant analcohol ethoxylate, a polyethylene glycol sorbitan ester, a polyethyleneglycol ether, a polyoxyethylene ether, a poly(propyleneglycol)-block-poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(propylene glycol), apoly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(propylene glycol)-block-poly(ethyleneglycol), or mixture thereof, and has an HLB value between 13 and 18;from about 0.1 wt. % to about 5 wt. % of a buffering agent; wherein thebuffering agent comprises CAPS, CHES, HEPBS, HEPES, HEPPS, MOPS, MES,Tris, an organic acid or salt thereof, an inorganic acid or saltthereof, or a mixture thereof; from about 0.01 wt. % to about 30 wt. %of a stabilizing agent comprising glycerol, polyethylene glycol 200,polyethylene glycol 400, propylene glycol, sucrose, or a mixturethereof; and from about 55 wt. % to about 97 wt. % of water; wherein thecomposition has a pH of between about 3 and about 4.75.
 11. Thecomposition of claim 10, wherein the cellulase comprises acellobiohydrolase, an endoglucanase, a beta glucosidase, or acombination or mixture thereof.
 12. The composition of claim 11, whereinthe cellulase is derived from an expression product of Trichodermareesei.
 13. The composition of claim 10, wherein the composition furthercomprises a colorant, an additional enzyme, a fragrance, an additionalsurfactant, a thickening agent, or a mixture thereof.
 14. A method ofcleaning a bacterial cellulose deposit comprises: (a) contacting a hardsurface with the composition of claim 1 for a sufficient time to atleast partially degrade the bacterial cellulose deposit.
 15. The methodof claim 14, wherein a sufficient time is at least about 5 seconds. 16.The method of claim 15, wherein method further comprises a step: (b)rinsing the hard surface with water at a temperature between about 10°C. and about 100° C.